Current yield trends in Lido and EigenLayer restaking
Lido manages 28% of staked ETH while EigenLayer dominates the restaking market with over $15 billion in TVL. Users can achieve 5% to 10% APY by stacking LST rewards or utilize LRTs like ether.fi for automated AVS selection and higher yields.
LST dominance and reward stacking
Lido manages 28% of all staked ETH. This concentration creates centralization risks for the Ethereum network. Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) account for 37% of total staked ETH. LSTs provide 3% to 4.5% APY from network participation. Users stack these rewards by providing LSTs as liquidity in AMMs or as collateral in lending protocols. A strategy combining staking with Curve fees and Convex rewards produces 5% to 10% APY. LSTs like stETH and rETH are the primary tools for this. Rocket Pool holds about 5% of the market and uses over 3,000 operators to mitigate centralization. Lido relies on 30 node operators. LSTs permit the minting of decentralized stablecoins and facilitate liquidity provision. This liquidity allows users to participate in various DeFi protocols without selling their underlying assets. Many LST protocols lower the validator threshold to 4 or 8 ETH. LSTs are similar to stablecoins and wrapped tokens to maintain their peg to the underlying asset. Arbitrageurs work to align the market price with the protocol value to maintain stability. LSTs enable trading and transfers within DeFi.
EigenLayer and AVS growth
EigenLayer controls 93.9% of the restaking market with over $15 billion in TVL. EigenLayer TVL peaked above $20 billion. AVSs like EigenDA and EigenAI use restaked ETH to provide security for various services. These services pay rewards to operators and stakers to compensate for the added slashing risk. Slashing went live on April 17, 2025. This mechanism uses Unique Stake Allocation to prevent a single AVS from slashing an entire operator’s stake. The AVS ecosystem includes data availability layers, oracle networks, and bridge security. When you delegate to an operator, you inherit the technical and economic risks of every AVS that operator joins, even if you do not approve of the specific slashing conditions or the complex reward distribution models set by the AVS. AVSs like AltLayer and Brevis handle rollup infrastructure and ZK computation. EigenDA secured over $2 billion in L2 customer assets. EigenAI and EigenCompute went live on the mainnet in late 2025. EigenCloud unifies EigenDA, EigenVerify, and EigenCompute. AVSs pay rewards in ETH, native tokens, or stablecoins. Operators set their per-AVS fee rate anywhere from 0% to 100%.
LRT liquidity and risk management
LRTs automate the selection of AVSs and operators for users. Ether.fi remains the largest LRT protocol with over $2.8 billion in TVL. LRT yields typically stay between 4% and 8% depending on AVS selection. Kelp DAO lost approximately $280 million to $293 million during an April 2026 exploit involving a LayerZero bridge. Does the higher yield from LRTs justify this bridge dependency? Other protocols like Renzo and Puffer compete for market share. Renzo uses an algorithmic model to select AVSs and operators automatically. Puffer and Swell also target the liquid restaking market. The user in this scenario needs to consider the smart contract risk of the LRT, the EigenLayer protocol, the AVSs, and any bridges used. Liquid restaking tokens like weETH, rsETH, and ezETH act as claims on restaked ETH plus earned yield. Ether.fi handles the complexity of operator selection and AVS management. Users must monitor for depegging when market volatility increases. These tokens stay tradable to maintain liquidity.
| Yield Type | Expected APY | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|
| Base ETH Staking | 3% to 4.5% | Low |
| Restaking (Base) | 4% to 6% | Medium |
| LRT (with incentives) | 4% to 8% | High |
Join the discussion