AggLayer maintains liquidity during bridge exploits
AggLayer processed $200M in bridge volume despite a $292M rsETH drain on KelpDAO's LayerZero bridge. The system utilized ZK proofs and onchain pessimistic proofs via Succinct's SP1 and Polygon Plonky3 to prevent bad debt and ensure security across connected chains.
AggLayer processed $200M in bridge volume after a forged signature on KelpDAO’s LayerZero bridge drained $292M in rsETH on a Saturday night. This attack created $230 million in bad debt on Aave because the attacker used the stolen rsETH as collateral to borrow ETH. Within 24 hours of the exploit, users pulled $6.6 billion from Aave. While Lido, SparkLend, Fluid, Upshift, and Ethena paused markets, Katana maintained zero exposure due to its native AggLayer connectivity. AggLayer uses ZK proofs and onchain pessimistic proofs; these are powered by Succinct’s SP1 proving system and Polygon Plonky3 to secure the ecosystem. Instead of relying on a committee of off-chain operators to attest to transactions, AggLayer uses cryptographic receipts that any machine can verify in milliseconds. This mathematical approach prevents the infinite-mint category of bridge attacks because the pessimistic proof checks the ledger to ensure no corresponding deposit exists for any withdrawal before the system finalizes the transaction for users. A malicious or compromised chain cannot trigger actions or drain funds on other chains. Polygon’s security, product, and support teams worked with ecosystem partners around the clock to monitor exposure.
POL contracts reached mainnet following the migration from MATIC to support the AggLayer’s expansion. POL is the native gas and staking token with a 2% annual emission rate. Staking Hub allows POL holders to validate multiple chains and perform roles such as sequencing and ZK proof generation. You already know the basics of token migration, but the POL transition changes the network’s economic structure. The Polygon 2.0 roadmap builds an aggregated network where the AggLayer accepts proofs from connected chains like X Layer and Polygon zkEVM. The AggLayer accepts proofs from connected chains, verifies that chain states are consistent, and settles to Ethereum. This process ensures that all connected chains share a single, unified state. X Layer, a ZK chain built using Polygon CDK by the exchange OKX, connects to these first components to provide a decentralized route for millions of users. This connection helps scale the network to a massive ecosystem. Developers use the Polygon CDK to launch custom zero-knowledge blockchains with integrated AggLayer connectivity. This setup provides access to unified liquidity and ZK security out-of-the-box for any chain built on the stack. The AggLayer achieves objectives such as asset fungibility and low-latency transaction messaging. Asset fungibility via a unified bridge allows L1 assets to be safely used across different chains. Governance follows a two-pillar model including Protocol Governance and Community Treasury Governance. The Polygon Protocol Council, a body of 13 members, manages narrow-in-scope changes to system smart contracts. A framework for community-driven funding via PFP-1 also reached community consensus.
Polygon engineers resolved a node bug in Bor and Erigon that caused 10-15 minute delays in consensus finality. This Wednesday issue disrupted Remote Procedure Call services and caused access problems for decentralized applications. While the blockchain continued to produce blocks and checkpoints, the Heimdall finality mechanism failed to produce expected milestones. This disruption mirrors past Ethereum Layer-2 slowdowns like the Arbitrum sequencer halt and Optimism downtime. Polygon plans to launch the Heimdall v2 upgrade to reduce finality to 5 seconds. Immutable zkEVM remains live and gas free for gamers, while Polygon Miden continues development as part of the CDK stack. Users choose between transaction costs and compatibility.
| Metric | Polygon zkEVM | zkSync Era |
|---|---|---|
| Avg. ETH Transfer Cost | $0.01 – $0.05 | $0.10 – $0.20 |
| Time to Finality | 15-30 minutes | ~1 hour |
| Security Model | 1-of-N + 10d timelock | Multi-sig |
Can the network maintain this level of security if validator coordination failures become more frequent during high-volume periods?
Join the discussion